Monday, August 22, 2011

Gog (1954)

It was worth watching Gog, which is a fairly tedious, but stylish 50s sci-fi outing, just to see Herbert Marshall with these awesome round, tortoise-shell glasses and undone polka-dot bowtie. If I didn't know better I'd say that Thomas Dolby stole his entire look from this screencap. (Of course, I do know better. He stole it from Harold Lloyd.) I would have felt amply reward for my time, but I was also treated to the image of urbane and elegant Mr. Marshall carrying a flame-thrower later in the film. In that scene, Marshall bears the most priceless look: a mixture of boredom, loathing and back pain that perfectly sums up this late period of his career. At that moment you can see that he is thinking that Ernst Lubitsch or Alfred Hitchcock would never have made him carry a flame-thrower.



I work in an almost 100 year old physics building, which is mainly furnished in cold war Herman Miller and old oscilloscopes. One of the credits in the film thanks Minneapolis Honeywell Controls, a name intimately familiar to Minnesota physicists. I could walk out the door of my office and start filming Gog. Or rather Wes Anderson could. Since all Anderson's films are elaborately set-up homages to art directors of films past, I think he could really do something with Gog. And when he does, brother, do I have the dials and gauges for him.

Speaking of work, watching Gog is a bit like being on the job because it takes so long to get to the actual plot of the film. Each of the labs in the elaborate underground facility has a little cast of characters doing a different futuristic experiment. They range from the plausible (a space mirror that blows stuff up) to the campy (a sexy couple who wear magnetic leotards and dance around trying to simulate zero gravity conditions). Each experiment is explained in detail to the point where even Wes Anderson would be shouting, "get on with it already. Bring on the killer robots."

Since I brought up killer robots you should know a couple of things. First of all everyone in Gog pronounces the word "robot" as if were "row-bit" stressing the first syllable and barely pronouncing the second. This also happens to be the quirky habit of a character on the kid's tv show, Word Girl, that my son watches. I'm not going to say "robot" the right way any more. I'm going to say it the Gog/Word Girl from now on. The second thing you need to know is the robots roll around slowly and swing their arms randomly. They are about as terrifying as the Daleks on Doctor Who, which is to say not terrifying at all.

The very Leslie Nielsenesque Richard Egan, "stars" and forties film noir siren, Constance Dowling plays Marshall's assistant who takes us on the real-time tour of the endless laboratory. Dowling manages to fill out a jumpsuit in an inspiring way, but she is saddled with a horrible haircut that reminds me of Jobriath. Egan's character is sent in to investigate a series of killings in the laboratory, which means when the plot does eventually arrive it feels like an episode of Columbo with good production values. The robots kill everyone remotely by manipulating all the automated controls around the lab. Oh goody! More closeups of dials and gauges! I'm sure there are people out there who have a fetish for vintage scientific equipment, and Gog is to them the most amazing porn ever, but the rest of us will long for the robots to roll slowly up to someone and bludgeon them with random arm movements.

I'm not really all that interested in 1950s science fiction except as a clearing house for some of my favorite actors of earlier eras. You know I watched Forbidden Planet just because Walter Pidgeon was in it. To that end, Netflix Instant has been streaming a lot of rarities in the genre, like this one. Stream it while you can, people.

12 comments:

SteveQ said...

Thomas Dolby? Jobriath? Has there been a return of "Cosmic Slop?"

I watch 50's SF, looking at equipment, saying "own it, own it, want it..."
I still need the "Robot Monster" bubble machine, though.

Jennythenipper said...

Cosmic slop is never far from my heart, Steve.
I think maybe the physics building needs to have a once a year auction on equipment. Someone out there has to want this stuff.

Sarah said...

Now I HAVE to see this movie. HM in the 50's?? Sigh. And I so promised myself to take it easy after doing a little "clearing house" myself with Joan Blondell. I am never gonna get back that 93 minutes Kona Coast STOLE from me. Never.

kate gabrielle said...

wow, this is on netflix instant? DEFINITELY adding it to my queue. I love Herbert Marshall!

Randy Wilharm said...

This movie is a jewel to me.

I first saw it on a rainy weekend night,
maybe around 1972.
It was playing on a fuzzy UHF station
from Boston and because the weather was bad, it was showing in B&W as opposed to color. I hadn't seen this movie in nearly 30yrs, so I assumed it was a Black & White movie until I saw it again maybe 5yrs ago.
A delightful surprise!

Interesting points:
1) Constance Dowling eventually married producer Ivan Tors.
2) The two actors who performed the "centrifuge" scene became terribly sick from the motion and the scene was barely finished. Looking closer at the scene we can see that they were seated in such a way as to subject the left side of their bodies to all centrifugal force. If the machine were constructed like a NASA centrifuge (where they would be facing the hub of the machine) they probably wouldn't have become ill.
3) Actor William Schallert was very well-paid for the 2 days he worked filming...I can't remember the amount, but it was a lot for the time.
4) In a real-life scenario, an opposing foriegn power that gained control of NOVAC would never attack individuals, thereby revealing its presence. It would more than likely attack the atomic reactor for better destructive results unless the foriegn power had planned on occupying the complex.
5) This movie was actually filmed in 3-D...IMDB claims there is only 1 copy of the 2 3-D reels in existence, but a 3-D version of this movie has been spotted on the Internet from somewhat less-than-legal sources.
6) Actors were inside of "Gog" and "Magog" when filming, to manipulate them for the camera.
7) Numerous references were made of an atomic "pile" in the complex. I saw no pile of any kind whatsoever as the sets & props were quite tidy.


Thank You

IN GOG WE TRUST

vancouverappliancerepair said...

Wow.....What a nice post!!....Your post is an excellent example of why I keep coming back to read your excellent quality content that is
forever updated.I would like to read newer posts and to share my thoughts
with you.Thanks a lot....

Vancouver Appliance Repair

pegge lee said...

Superb post! I've bookmarked your web site as well for the reason that I realized it is actually educational and I enjoyed reading your posts.it appears like you'll do a fantastic job on the net.


gotowe prace licencjackie


anna catherine said...

I admit, I have not been on this webpage in a long time... however it was another joy to see It is such an important topic and ignored by so many, even professionals.

klima montajı

trishacloud1203 said...

Great information about Gog (1954). I am so pleased to analysis such an amazing yet so useful exposition here. I value this material so much, believe in there are more essay material as this one. Never been so wanting to analysis.

Nellie June said...

Hi


This Film which i was seen in my childhood was nice i really gather lot of information about the film i really gathered lot of initial information about the film

HMA

sandie gobk said...

Thats Nice to see your blog. i like this flim very much its quite interesting. Its a great pleasure to watch this blog. keep sharnig more!!!. bankruptcy attorney san diego

yepimg mater said...

G 1954 and the impression may bring, more and really meaning it. friv 3